JUDGMENT :

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

There happens to be an inter-se dispute between the parties to all these C482 Applications. All these C482 Applications are supported with the respective Compounding Applications.

2. In order to verify the propriety of the Compounding Applications, the parties were directed to appear in person or through Video Conferencing in order to facilitate the Court in order to arrive at a conclusion, as to the Compounding Application and the conditions contained therein are acceptable by the parties or not.

3. Arising out of the dispute over a property, there was a civil suit instituted, being Suit No.16 of 2016 Ritu Jhamb vs. Rohit Kakkad. This First Appeal was listed yesterday and in the First Appeal there was a Compromise Application, being filed i.e. I.A. No.16497 of 2023 and the parties have unanimously agreed to settle their dispute in terms of the compromise dated27.03.2023. It was that based on the compromise which was acceptable by the parties, the First Appeal No.240 of 2019 Ritu Jhamb vs. Rohit Kakkad and others was decided and accordingly the decree rendered by the trial court on 24.09.2019, stood modified in terms of the compromise dated 27.03.2023