IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, PANKAJ PUROHIT, JJ.
Deepika Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 469 of 2023
Decided On : 19-10-2023
Transfer of Services - Medical Officer - Government Order dated 05.09.2022 - Summary: The court discussed the petitioner's request for transfer of services from the Department of Medical Health to the Department of Medical Education in light of the Government Order dated 05.09.2022, which permits transfer of Post Graduate Degree holders in non-clinical subjects from the Department of Health to the Department of Medical Education. The court held that the Government Order does not create an indefeasible right of transfer in favor of Medical officers with P.G. Degree in non-clinical subjects, and without rendering the required length of service in terms of the bond, the petitioner cannot compel the State Government to relieve her from the Department of Medical Health for joining in some other Department.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner completed MBBS Course from Uttarakhand Forest Hospital Trust Medical College and received a scholarship from the State Government on the condition of serving the State for a minimum period of five years. She sought permission to pursue a non-clinical postgraduate course, which was not granted as per the bond terms. After completing the course, she tendered resignation, which was not accepted due to the bond conditions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's request for transfer of services was not justified as the Government Order does not create an indefeasible right of transfer in favor of Medical officers with P.G. Degree in non-clinical subjects, and without fulfilling the bond conditions, she cannot compel the State Government to relieve her from the Department of Medical Health for joining in some other Department.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's request for transfer of services from the Department of Medical Health to the Department of Medical Education, the bond conditions, and the Government Order dated 05.09.2022.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the bond conditions, the Government Order dated 05.09.2022, and the petitioner's obligation to fulfill the required length of service as per the bond terms before seeking transfer of services.
Final Decision: The writ petition failed, and the court dismissed the petitioner's request for transfer of services, emphasizing that without fulfilling the bond conditions, the petitioner cannot compel the State Government to relieve her from the Department of Medical Health for joining in some other Department.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
1. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following substantive reliefs:-
(ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 10.10.2023 (Annexure no. 1 to the petition) by which the respondent no. 3 has not granted the benefit of the Govt. order dated 05.09.2022 and is compelling her to join her duties at PHC Badaloo, District Pithoragarh.
(iii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents in case the petitioner is not being granted the benefit of the govt. order dated 05.09.2022 and if her services are not being transferred from department of Medical Health and Family Welfare to the department of Medical Education, the petitioner may be exonerated to make any payment to the respondents.
(iv) In case, the Hon’ble Court comes to the conclusion that the service of the petitioner is not liable to be transferred from the department of Medical Health and Family Welfare to the Department of Medical Education and if she is not being posted at any government Medical College in the State of Uttarakhand, in pursuance to the government order dated 05.09.2022, her resignation may kindly be accepted with effects from the date of receiving the representation submitted by the petitioner on 02.09.2023 and she may be exempted from the operation of the bond which has been obtained from her under compulsion at the time of counselling of post graduate course.
2. Petitioner completed MBBS Course from Uttarakhand Forest Hospital Trust Medical College, now known as ‘Government Medical College’. While pursuing said course, she received scholarship from State Government on the condition that she will serve the State for a minimum period of five years upon completion of MBBS Course. The terms and conditions, on which scholarship was given to petitioner, are mentioned in the surety bond executed by her in favour of State Government, which is on record as Annexure-2 to the writ petition.
3. Before completing five years service, as per surety bond, petitioner sought permission from the Competent Authority to pursue Postgraduate Course in a non-clinical subject, namely, Anatomy. State Government had decided that Medical Officers, who were serving in Government Hospitals, as per the bond, would be given permission for post-graduation in clinical subjects only.
4. Petitioner approached this Court by filing WPMS No. 1148 of 2020, in which following interim order was passed on 23.07.2020:-
This prima facie does not seems to be fair.
The permission granted to the petitioner shall be treated to be permission to appear in clinical as well as non clinical course.
It is, however, made clear that mere appearance of the petitioner for the counselling whether for clinical or non clinical purposes will not in any way come to her benefit, as far as this condition i.e. to serve the State of Uttarakhand for five years as Medical Officer or to pay the entire f
AI
Fulfillment of bond conditions is essential before seeking transfer of services, and Government Orders do not create an indefeasible right of transfer in favor of individuals with P.G. Degree in non-....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to consider a petitioner's necessary qualification and unjustified posting when making fitment transfer and posting orders.
The discretionary power of the State Government in filling up vacancies, the lack of right to claim anticipated vacancies, and the role of the State as a model employer were central legal principles ....
Transfer orders must align with public interest and established norms; courts can intervene if government action is arbitrary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.