SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 644

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
M/S Samia International Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Another - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 1372 of 2023
Decided On : 17-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mohd. Shafy.
For the Respondents:Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Government Advocate, Mr. Arhar Baig.

The mandatory nature of registering an FIR in cases of cognizable offences and the limitations on the police's power to avoid registering an FIR if a cognizable offence is disclosed.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Real Estate Development - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 154 - Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - The court discussed the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, particularly Section 154, and the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, in relation to lodging of FIRs against the petitioners. The court highlighted the mandatory nature of registering an FIR in cases of cognizable offences and the limitations on the police's power to avoid registering an FIR if a cognizable offence is disclosed. The court also emphasized that blanket directions cannot be issued to the police for not lodging FIRs, particularly in cases where a civil dispute may also have an element of criminality.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, developers of a real estate project, sought relief from the court to prevent the registration of any FIR against them or their company by proposed buyers of land/flats from their project. They claimed that the police were lodging FIRs against them without valid reasons, tarnishing their reputation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no merit in the petition and dismissed it at the stage of admission itself.

Issues: The main issue was whether the court should issue a writ of mandamus to prevent the registration of FIRs against the petitioners by proposed buyers of their real estate project.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the mandatory nature of registering an FIR in cases of cognizable offences and the limitations on the police's power to avoid registering an FIR if a cognizable offence is disclosed. It also highlighted that blanket directions cannot be issued to the police for not lodging FIRs, particularly in cases where a civil dispute may also have an element of criminality.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed in limine.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:-

    “I. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to register any FIR against the petitioner no.2 or against the company of the petitioner no.1 or its employees, which may be lodged by the proposed buyers of the land/flats from the company of the petitioner no.1 “M/s Samiah International Builders Pvt. Ltd.” now known as “M/s Samiah International Builders Limited” with regard to its project situated at “Samiah Lake City” Kashipur Road, Rudrapur District Udham Singh Nagar.

II. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to ask the informant, if any, who comes to lodge an FIR against the petitioners or against the employees or officers of the company of the petitioner no.1 which is being run in the name and style of “M/s Samiah International Builders Pvt. Ltd.” now known as “M/s Samiah International Builders Limited: with regard to its project at “Samiah Lake City” Kashipur Road, Rudrapur, to settle his grievance either before the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Authority Dehradun or put his grievance before the District Legal Service Authority Udham Singh Nagar at Rudrapur for mediation and conciliation.

III. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to halt the investigation in all the matters which have been registered against the petitioners or against the employees of the petitioners’ company M/s SAmiah International Builders Pvt. Ltd. now know as “Saia International Builders Ltd”, Kashipur Road, Rudrapur, with regard to the project known as “Samiah Lake City”, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar.

IV. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the petitioners, they are developers and work under the name and style of M/S Samia International Builders Pvt. Ltd. (“the developers”). The developers have sanctioned a project known as Samia Lake City, wherein both 4500 flats and plots are to be sold. 1136 plots/flats have already been handed over to the purchasers out of 1812 plots/flats that has been booked. Still an amount of Rs.5,367/- Lacks is to be recovered from the persons, who have booked their plots/flats. The petitioners have grievance that the police is not exercising the power lawfully and lodging FIR after FIR against the developers without any valid reasons.

4. It is the case of the petitioners that earlier various FIRs were lodged against the petitioners in which either anticipatory bail was granted; or compromised; or protection was granted by this Court. The details are as follows:-

S.N.

Informant

FIR No.

Order of Hon’ble Court

1.

Ghanshyam Dutt Chaturvedi

255/2023

Compromised (WPCRL 1724/2023)

2.

Mohd. Shahzad Khan

215/2023

Interim anticipatory bail has been granted by the Hon’ble Court (ABA No.312/2023)

3.

Smt. Firdous Khan

216/2023

Interim anticipatory bail has been granted by the Hon’ble Court (ABA No.329/2023)

4.

Ms. Farheen Khan

217/2023

Interim anticipatory bail has been granted by the Hon’ble Court (ABA No.427/2023)

5.

Fardeen Khan

218/2023

Interim anticipatory bail has been granted by the Hon’ble Court (ABA No.313/2023)

6.

Arham Khan

221/2023

Interim anticipatory bail has been granted by the Hon’ble Court in Anticipatory bail application (ABA No.325/2023) An order of protection from coercive steps has also granted in the writ petition. (WPCRL No.1145 of 2023).

7.

Parvej Alam

424/2023

An order of protection from coercive steps has been granted in the writ petition (WPCRL No.1099 of 2023).

8.

Rajes

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top