SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 175

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Jalaj Gaur - Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand - Respondent
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 593 of 2024
Decided On : 05-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Navneet Kaushik.
For the State : Mr. Rakesh Negi, Brief Holder.

IMPORTANT POINT
Anticipatory bail can be granted when the applicant demonstrates no direct involvement in the alleged crime, especially when personal liberty is at stake and the charge-sheet has been filed.

Headnote:

ANTICIPATORY BAIL - SCHOLARSHIP SCAM - The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court noted that the applicant, as Chairman of the Society running the educational institutions, had no direct involvement in the alleged fraudulent activities, and the charge-sheet had already been filed, reducing the risk of evidence tampering. Conditions for bail were set to ensure the applicant's presence at trial and prevent interference with the investigation.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with a scholarship scam involving BRD College of Management Sciences and BRD Private ITI, where he was the Chairman of the managing Society. An FIR was lodged after a Special Investigation Team's inquiry into the matter.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant had no direct role in the day-to-day operations of the institutions and had not received any scholarship funds. The charge-sheet had been filed, indicating no need for custodial interrogation, and the applicant was a permanent resident with no prior convictions.

Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail considering the nature of the allegations and his role in the institutions involved in the scholarship scam.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted that personal liberty is a fundamental right that should only be curtailed when absolutely necessary. The lack of direct involvement in the alleged crime and the filing of the charge-sheet were significant factors in granting bail.

Result: The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, subject to certain conditions to ensure compliance with the trial process and prevent any interference with the investigation.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Kumar Verma, J.

This Application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed for Anticipatory Bail under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in connection with the Case Crime No. 162 of 2020 (Criminal Case No.713 of 2021), registered at police station Gangnahar, District Haridwar.

2. A Special Investigation Team was constituted in the scholarship scam matter. Sub-Inspector-Mr. Khajan Singh Chauhan was a member of the said Special Investigation Team. He enquired the matter and lodged an FIR on 14.03.2020. The First Information Report was registered against the owner and the manager of BRD College of Management Sciences and BRD Private ITI.

3. Heard Mr. Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State.

4. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, argued that the Institute, namely, “BRD College of Management Sciences” and “BRD Private ITI” were run by a Society, namely, “Baburam Degree College”. Applicant, aged about 53 years, was the Chairman of the said Society. He had no direct role in the day to day affairs of the running of the said Institutes. All the concerned students were enrolled and the scholarship amount was received by them. Applicant had not received any scholarship amount. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. He is not a previous convict, and, he was granted interim relief in the Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

5. On the other hand, Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State has opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application orally. However, he submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation.

6. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant - Jalaj Gaur is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing his personal bond of Rs.30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount on the following conditions:-

    (i) Applicant shall attend the Trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case;

(iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court.

8. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

9. Anticipatory Bail Application (No. 593 of 2024) stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top