Surendra vs State of Uttarakhand - 2024 Supreme(UK) 109

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 109

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Surendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel i/b Mr. Sanjeev Singh, learned counsel.
For the State : Mr. K.S. Bora, learned DAG along with Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA and Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder.

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Purohit, J.

This appeal is preferred by the appellants under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Cr.P.C.”) assailing the judgment and order dated 18.04.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/3rd Fast Track Court, Haridwar in Sessions Trial No.329 of 1999, State vs. Surendra & another, whereby the said court has held the appellants guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 436, 304/34 & 429 IPC and sentenced each of them as follows:-

S. No.	Name of accused	Conviction	Sentence	Fine	Sentence in lieu of fine
1.	Surendra	436 IPC	07 years’ R.I.	Rs.5,000/-	06 months’ additional imprisonment
		304 IPC	07 years’ R.I.	Rs.5,000/-	06 months’ additional imprisonment
		429 IPC	03 years’ R.I.	Rs.2,000/-	02 months’ additional imprisonment.
2.	Amar Singh	436 IPC	07 years’ R.I.	Rs.5,000/-	06 months’ additional imprisonment
		304/34 IPC	07 years’ R.I.	Rs.5,000/-	06 months’ additional imprisonment
		429 IPC	03 years’ R.I.	Rs.2,000/-	02 months’ addit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(UK) 109

PANKAJ PUROHITSurendra – AppellantVersusState of Uttarakhand – Respondent

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Surendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent