SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 79

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

Prabhjot Singh alias Prabhjeet Singh alias Pannu - Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand - Respondent
First Bail Application No. 2599 Of 2023
Decided On : 21-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. S.R.S. Gill, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Rakesh Negi, Brief Holder.
For the Victim/Informant : Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Senior Adv. assisted by Mr. Amanjot Singh Chaddha, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that personal liberty is paramount, and bail should be granted unless there are compelling reasons to deny it.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 439 - The court interpreted the provisions of bail, emphasizing personal liberty and the conditions under which bail may be granted, ultimately allowing the application for bail based on the circumstances presented.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving charges of murder and conspiracy. The prosecution alleged that the applicant provided a motorcycle used in the crime, while the defense argued the applicant's innocence and lack of evidence against him.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant had been in custody for a significant period, there was no likelihood of absconding, and the conditions for bail were met, thus allowing the bail application without commenting on the merits of the case.

Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure given the circumstances of the case and the nature of the charges against him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that bail is a rule and incarceration is an exception, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty and the need for the accused to be present during trial.

Result: The bail application is allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) :

The present Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed for regular bail in connection with the First Information Report No. 631 of 2022, registered at police station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2. The applicant is in judicial custody under Section 302 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant’s uncle Mahal Singh was reading a newspaper at his house on 13.10.2022. Two unknown persons came on a motorcycle at around 8:30 a.m. and fired, due to which, Mahal Singh died on the spot. 6-7 days before this incident, Mahal Singh received a phone call from Harjeet Singh, the co-accused, from Canada. He was demanding money from Mahal Singh. Harjeet Singh had threatened to kill him for not giving money. First Information Report was registered on 13.10.2022 at 23:09 hrs against Harjeet Singh.

4. Charge-sheet has been filed by the Investigating Officer against the present applicant and co-accused before the concerned court.

5. Heard Mr. S.R.S. Gill, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amanjot Singh Chaddha, learned counsel for the victim/informant.

6. Opposing the Bail Application, Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate for the victim/informant contended that the present applicant had gone to the shop of the prosecution witness-Jarnail Singh, who runs a second hand motorcycle dealership, on 12.10.2022 at about 7 p.m. and after paying Rs. 15,000/-, took a Honda Shine motorcycle with him. The registration number of the said motorcycle is UK06K4963, whose registered owner is Shankar Singh. Applicant had provided the said motorcycle to the shooters, the co-accused, who carried out the incident using the said motorcycle. The police of Rajabpur police station of District Amroha (U.P.) had found the said motorcycle in abandoned condition on 15.10.2022. The said motorcycle was seized in the present case on 29.12.2022. The said motorcycle was identified by Mahendra Kashyap, who was working at Jarnail Singh’s shop and delivered the vehicle to the present applicant, and, the report of Forensic Science Laboratory has also supported the case of the prosecution.

7. On the other hand, Mr. S.R.S. Gill, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He had given Rs. 15,000/- in advance to purchase a motorcycle from the shop of Jarnail Singh. The registration number of the said motorcycle is not UK06K4963 but its number is UK18K4963. After he paid the remaining Rs. 2,000/-, Jarnail Singh handed over the said motorcycle on 16.10.2022, whereas the alleged incident was occurred on 13.10.2022. The said motorcycle was not recovered from the possession of the applicant. The alleged recovered motorcycle has neither a chassis number nor an engine number. Shankar Singh, the registered owner of UK06K4963, was not examined during the course of the investigation to identify the recovered motorcycle. The copy of CCTV footage has not been filed.

8. Mr. S.R.S. Gill, Advocate, further contended that the applicant is not a previous convict. He is in judicial custody since 18.10.2022. He is a permanent resident of District Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, there is no likelihood of his absconding. Three co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court, and, the charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, there is no possibility of tampering with the evidence.

9. Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The object of keeping the accused in detention during the trial is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance of the accused.

10.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top