SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 324

MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, PANKAJ PUROHIT
Raj Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Mr. A.S. Rawat, Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocates assisted by Mr. Anup Kumar Verma, Mr. R.S. Rawat, Mr. C.S. Dalakoti, Mr. Narayan Har Gupta, Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Mr. T.C. Pandey and Mr. A.K. Tripathi, Counsel.
For the State of Uttarakhand :Mr. S.N. Babulkar, Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General.
For the G.B. Pant University : Mr. S.S. Lingwal.
For the ICAR : Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht.
For the UGC : Ms. Anjali Bhargava.

JUDGMENT :

Since common questions of facts and law are involved in these writ petitions, therefore, these are being heard and decided together by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition (S/B) No. 327 of 2023 alone are being considered and discussed. Petitioner Dr. Raj Kumar Singh has sought the following reliefs :

    “I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, summoning the records from G.B. Pant University, Pantnagar, and quashing the impugned orders 04.07.2023 and 12.07.2023, issued by respondent nos. 1 & 2, contained in Annexure-1 & 2 to this petition.

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 to 6 not to remove the petitioner from the post of Professor and HOD, department of Agrometeorology pursuant to the impugned orders contained in Annexure-1 & 2 to this petition.

III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 to 6 not to deprive the petitioner of any service benefits pursuant to the impugned orders, contained in Annexure-1 & 2 to this petition.”

2. It is not in dispute that petitioner was appointed on the post of Junior

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top