SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 340

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Akeel – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Mr. S.K. Mandal.
For the Respondent: Mr. M.A. Khan, AGA.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

The challenge in this revision is made to the followings:-

    (i) Judgment and order dated 27.09.2013, passed in Criminal Case No.1208 of 2013, State vs. Akeel, by the court of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)/Judicial Magistrate Haldwani, District Nainital (“the case”). By it, the revisionist has been convicted under Section 279, 304-A, 427 IPC; and sentenced as follows:-

(a) Under Section 279 IPC, to undergo imprisonment for a period of one month with a fine of Rs.200/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo imprisonment for a further period of two days.

(b) Under Section 304-A IPC, to undergo imprisonment for a period of three months with a fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo imprisonment for a further period of fifteen days.

(c) Under Section 427 IPC, to undergo imprisonment for a period of three months with a fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo imprisonment for a further period of fifteen days and

(ii) The judgment and order dated 13.05.2015, passed in Criminal Appeal No.173 of 2013, Akeel vs. State of Uttarakhand, by the court of 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top