Savej Alam Alias Lukka alias Mohd. Shahzeb vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 510

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Savej Alam Alias Lukka alias Mohd. Shahzeb – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. R.K. Rawat, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Vipul Painuly, Brief Holder

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0354 of 2023, under Section 3/5/11(1) of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station ITI, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, on 05.11.2023, police raided a premises and recovered beef and other articles. It is the case in the FIR that the applicant managed to escape from the place of incident.

4. It is the case of the applicant that nothing was recovered from him; he has been falsely implicated.

5. Learned State Counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He would submit that beef and other articles were recovered from the place of occurrence and the applicant managed to escape.

6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed.

7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

8. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document