SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 513

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Sachin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashutosh Thakral, learned counsel

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Purohit, J.

By means of this writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, petitioners have challenged the order dated 10.11.2022 (Annexure No.5) passed by the Court of Deputy Director of Consolidation, Haridwar passed in Revision No.51 of 2021-22, ‘Sachin Kumar & Ors. Vs. Santosh Devi & Ors.’, filed under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings At, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), by which while dismissing the revision, the order dated 27.12.2021 passed by learned Court of 4th Consolidation Officer, Roorkee was affirmed, whereby the delay in filing the restoration application has been condoned and the restoration application is directed to be decided on merits.

2. The petitioners have also impugned the entire proceedings on the ground that the same is abuse of the process and prayed to quash the entire proceedings of the Suit No.83 of 2020-21 ‘Smt. Santos Devi Vs. Somdutt (Deceased)’, which is initiated on the restoration application dated 17.12.2019, moved by the respondent herein.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that a compromise was arrived at between the parties on 01.10.1999 and the rights w.r.t. the property subject matter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top