PANKAJ PUROHIT
Sachin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Purohit, J.
By means of this writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, petitioners have challenged the order dated 10.11.2022 (Annexure No.5) passed by the Court of Deputy Director of Consolidation, Haridwar passed in Revision No.51 of 2021-22, ‘Sachin Kumar & Ors. Vs. Santosh Devi & Ors.’, filed under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings At, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), by which while dismissing the revision, the order dated 27.12.2021 passed by learned Court of 4th Consolidation Officer, Roorkee was affirmed, whereby the delay in filing the restoration application has been condoned and the restoration application is directed to be decided on merits.
2. The petitioners have also impugned the entire proceedings on the ground that the same is abuse of the process and prayed to quash the entire proceedings of the Suit No.83 of 2020-21 ‘Smt. Santos Devi Vs. Somdutt (Deceased)’, which is initiated on the restoration application dated 17.12.2019, moved by the respondent herein.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that a compromise was arrived at between the parties on 01.10.1999 and the rights w.r.t. the property subject matter
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.