SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 17

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION (UTC) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. establishment of facts regarding service termination and reinstatement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments concerning entitlement to gratuity and acp benefits. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court analysis on continuous service and gratuity eligibility. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. judgment on the illegality of non-payment of gratuity. (Para 22 , 23)
5. final orders on gratuity payment and acp representation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT :

Subhash Upadhyay, J.

1. As both the Writ Petitions involve similar question of facts and law hence, the same are being decided by this common Judgment.

2. The petitioner in WPSS No.11/2017, Ramesh Chandra Sharma died during the pendency of the writ petition and has been substituted by his wife Smt. Vijay Lakshmi. The petitioners have filed the writ petitions claiming gratuity for the entire length of service and have further claimed benefit of Assured Career Progression (ACP) on completion of 26 years of service. Petitioner Ramesh Chandra Sharma was appointed as driver in the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation on 07.12.1986 and his services were terminated vide order dated 28.12.1991.

3. Petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top