SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(MP) 53

SEN, BHUTT
PYARELAL – Appellant
Versus
MODI SIKHARCHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.RAZAK, R.S.DABIR

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs' appeal against the dismissal of a part of their claim for damages by the 2nd Civil Judge, 1st CJass, Sagar, in civil suit No. 11-B of 1947.

( 2 ) THE suit was instituted by Pyarelal and Pan-nalal, sons of Jankiprashad, Babulal, and Narayan-dass and Bhagwandass, sons of Babu Surajdin. They were carrying on business of purchase and sale of grain as partners of a registered firm styled durga Prashad Ganesh Dass, shortly called Durga Ganesh. They entered into a contract with the defendant on 6-7-1947 for purchase of his stock of linseed at satna. Out of this stock, a lot of 2500 bags was lying in the godown of the defendants' commission agent, Ramchand Rampratap, which was sold to the plaintiffs. O. R. Satna at Rs. 44/13/9 per bag of 90 seers net, after packing them in new gunny bags. The lower Court has found that the defendant broke the contract and was liable in damages to the plaintiffs. It has, however, determined the damages at the rate prevailing at Satna, arid not at Lillosh (Calcutta) on 28-7-1947 when the contract was broken. In this view, it awarded to the plaintiffs, Ks. 1914/1/- for damages instead of Rs. 9524-9-0 is claimed. This appeal was accor













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top