NEVASKAR
MEWALAL – Appellant
Versus
TOTALAL – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this case the only question involved is as regards the necessity of sanction under Section 197, Cr. P. Code, before the accused could be prosecuted. The charges me under Sections 500 and 504, I. P. C. , and the accused is a judicial officer. The circumstances alleged are that on 24-12-1953 the complainant was being examined as a witness in a civil case, which was going on before the said judicial officer. At that time he, in temper used the expression 'nalayak' (unfit) in relation to the complainant twice and on the third occasion, he said 'nalayak, you will be turned out of Court-room after beating with shoes'.
( 2 ) A complaint was filed on these allegations. An objection to the entertainability of this complaint was taken on the ground that it cannot proceed in the absence of sanction as required under Section 197, Cr. P. C. , as the act complained of could not have been done except in the purported exercise of his official duty or in other words it lay within the scope of his official duty. The objection was upheld and the accused was discharged.
( 3 ) A revision-petition was filed against this decision and that too was rejected. Both the Courts relied upo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.