SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 94

NEVASKAR
MEWALAL – Appellant
Versus
TOTALAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.V.Vaidya, L.S.SHUKLA, P.R.SHARMA

NEVASKAR, J.

( 1 ) IN this case the only question involved is as regards the necessity of sanction under Section 197, Cr. P. Code, before the accused could be prosecuted. The charges me under Sections 500 and 504, I. P. C. , and the accused is a judicial officer. The circumstances alleged are that on 24-12-1953 the complainant was being examined as a witness in a civil case, which was going on before the said judicial officer. At that time he, in temper used the expression 'nalayak' (unfit) in relation to the complainant twice and on the third occasion, he said 'nalayak, you will be turned out of Court-room after beating with shoes'.

( 2 ) A complaint was filed on these allegations. An objection to the entertainability of this complaint was taken on the ground that it cannot proceed in the absence of sanction as required under Section 197, Cr. P. C. , as the act complained of could not have been done except in the purported exercise of his official duty or in other words it lay within the scope of his official duty. The objection was upheld and the accused was discharged.

( 3 ) A revision-petition was filed against this decision and that too was rejected. Both the Courts relied upo









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top