SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 125

SAMVATSAR
GANESHI LAL RANCHHODDAS MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
SATYA NARAIN TIWARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Balwant Singh, Bhambani, SANGHI

SAMVATSAR, J.

( 1 ) FACTS giving rise to this petition are that the opponent No. 1 Satyanarain lodged a report at Chhatripura Police Station on 18-1-1954 that Sadhusingh had taken from him a pair of gold Kadas weighing about 13 or 13-1/2 tolas on 13-10-1952 on the pretext that they were required by his wife for use in the marriage of one of her relatives; that Sadhusingh did not return the gold Kadas, appropriated them to himself and pledged them as his own property.

( 2 ) ON this report the police registered an offence under Section 406, I. P. C,, and commenced investigation. On 19-1-1954 the police seized the gold Kadas from the petitioner Ganeshilal, proprietor of the firm Gendalal Ganpatlal, with whom sadhusingh had pledged them for Rs. 925 on 14-10-1952. Sadhusingh could not be arrested as he was found to be absconding. Proceedings were therefore taken under Section 512, Criminal Procedure Code, and in connection with these proceedings the pair of Kadas were produced in Court by the police.

( 3 ) ON 2-2-1954 the petitioner applied for return of the Kadas contending that they were pledged with him by Sadhusingh and he had a right to retain them so long as they were not redeemed











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top