SHIV DAYAL SHRIVASTAVA, A.H.KHAN
FIRM MAKHANLAL GIRWARLAL – Appellant
Versus
HARNARAIN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a first appeal by the plaintiff firm whose suit has been dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Gwalior.
( 2 ) THE facts are these. On 20-12-1952 Har Narain defendant No. 1, on behalf of himself and his minor son Ramjidas defendant No. 2, mortgaged a house in Janakganj, Lashkar for Rs. 8,000/-in favour of the plaintiff. The mortgage money was repayable within three years. There was a subsequent charge created by a deed of 30-3-1933 for Rs. 3,000/- on the same terms and conditions. On 1-6-1942 the mortgagors sold a part of the property to one Mataprasad and the latter paid to the mortgagee firm a sum of Rs. 12,000/- on 1-8-1942 when the portion sold to Mata Prasad was released by the mortgagee.
( 3 ) THE present suit was brought by the mortgagee on 19-12-1947 for Rs. 15,299/9/ -.
( 4 ) HAR Narain's defence was that the amount paid to the mortgagee on 1-81942 was in full and final satisfaction of the mortgage debt.
( 5 ) RAMJIDAS defendant No. 2 resisted the suit inter alia on the ground that his father had no right to mortgage the ancestral property as there was no legal necessity for the same.
( 6 ) THE trial Judge has held:
1. That the mortgage deb
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.