SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 200

SHIV DAYAL SHRIVASTAVA, A.H.KHAN
FIRM MAKHANLAL GIRWARLAL – Appellant
Versus
HARNARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.GUPTA, G.P.Patankar

SHIV DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a first appeal by the plaintiff firm whose suit has been dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Gwalior.

( 2 ) THE facts are these. On 20-12-1952 Har Narain defendant No. 1, on behalf of himself and his minor son Ramjidas defendant No. 2, mortgaged a house in Janakganj, Lashkar for Rs. 8,000/-in favour of the plaintiff. The mortgage money was repayable within three years. There was a subsequent charge created by a deed of 30-3-1933 for Rs. 3,000/- on the same terms and conditions. On 1-6-1942 the mortgagors sold a part of the property to one Mataprasad and the latter paid to the mortgagee firm a sum of Rs. 12,000/- on 1-8-1942 when the portion sold to Mata Prasad was released by the mortgagee.

( 3 ) THE present suit was brought by the mortgagee on 19-12-1947 for Rs. 15,299/9/ -.

( 4 ) HAR Narain's defence was that the amount paid to the mortgagee on 1-81942 was in full and final satisfaction of the mortgage debt.

( 5 ) RAMJIDAS defendant No. 2 resisted the suit inter alia on the ground that his father had no right to mortgage the ancestral property as there was no legal necessity for the same.

( 6 ) THE trial Judge has held:

1. That the mortgage deb























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top