SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 296

P.V.DIXIT, N.M.GOLVALKER
MOTI MIYAN – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, INDORE DIVISION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.KHASKALAM, RATAN SINGH

DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) BY this application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner moves for the issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing an order of the District Magistrate, Nimar, refusing to renew for the year 1958 the gun licence held by the petitioner and for quashing the order of the Commissioner, Indore Division, upholding the order of the District Magistrate. The petitioner also seeks a writ of mandamus to the District Magistrate, Nimar, for the renewal of his gun licence for the year 1958 and subsequent years.

( 2 ) THE petitioner states that he comes of a very ancient, respectable and loyal family of Nimar; that ever since 1935 right up to 30-3-1957 he held a gun licence; and that in 1957 when he again applied for the renewal of the licence under Rule 41 of the Indian Arms Rules, 1951, the District Magistrate of Nimar without holding any enquiry and without giving him an opportunity of hearing refused to renew the licence by an order dated 27-4-1957. According to the petitioner, the order did not state the reasons for the refusal. The petitioner then preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Indore Division, against the order of the Distric


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top