SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(MP) 297

T.C.SHRIVASTAVA, S.P.BHARGAVA
HITKARINI SABHA – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF THE CITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.SETH, R.S.DABIR, RAMA GUPTA, V.S.DABIR

SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed by the Hitkarini Sabha, Jabalpur, against the order of the 2nd Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, dated 14-9-1957, on a reference made by the Collector, Jabalpur, under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), Another appeal (Misc. Appeal No. 16 of 1958) arising out of the same proceedings has been filed by the Corporation of the City of Jabalpur. Both these appeals are disposed of by this order. ( 2 ) PLOTS Nos. 670, 671 and 735, situate in Madan Mahal Extension Area, Jabalpur, were acquired by the State Government under the Act for constructing the Home Science College. Plots Nos. 670 and 671 were partly occupied by structures. A notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on 2-3-1955 with respect to the vacant plot. Along with this notification, another notification under Section 17 (4) was also issued stating that the site was urgently needed and therefore the provisions of Section 5-A were dispensed with. . Thereafter, a notification under Section 6 was issued with respect to this plot. Similarly, a notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on 2-3-1955 with respect to th




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top