SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(MP) 54

P.V.DIXIT, N.M.GOLVALKER
Dadgulal Ramdas Nagori – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Committee, Burhar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A.P. Sen
For Respondents/Defendant: R.S. Dabir

JUDGMENT

N.M. Golvalker, J.

This is an appeal by the Defendant No. 1 against the decision of Bhutt J. (as he then was) in Second Appeal No. 112 of 1950 decided on the 22nd November 1956 reversing the decrees of both the lower Courts dismissing the Plaintiff-Committee's suit for possession.

The Plaintiff Municipal Committee filed a suit challenging the validity of the sale of its property to the Defendant No. 1 by Defendant. No. 2 in his capacity as its Officer-in-Charge during its supersession. Defendant No. 2 died during the pendency of the second appeal. Briefly stated the relevant facts are these. The Plaintiff-Committee was superseded in 1943 and the Defendant No. 2 was appointed by the Provincial Government as its Officer-in-Charge. The Plaintiff-Committee owned plots Nos. 166 and 169 within the Burhanpur municipal area. These plots were acquired by the Provincial Government under the Land Acquisition Act for the Plaintiff-Committee with a view to keep them open and remove congestion in that area. The Defendant No. 1 was the owner of the neighbouring house. He was in need of some area from these plots for better enjoyment of his own house property. He thereupon persuaded the Defe












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top