SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 83

P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
S. C. BARAT – Appellant
Versus
HARI VINAYAK PATASKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.H.SAFI, A.P.SEN, H.L.KHASKALAM, K.A.Chitale, K.B.SINHA, R.P.SINHA, R.S.DABIR, V.S.DABIR

P. V. DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution are members of the Jabalpur University Court. The applicant Dr. S. C. Barat is also a member of the Executive Council of the University and the other petitioner is a member of the Academic Council. They have filed this application for quashing by a suitable writ an order made by the respondent No. 1 the Chancellor of the university, appointing the respondent No. 4, Shri Avadh Bihari Mishra, as the Vice-Chancellor and for the issue of suitable directions to the Chancellor for the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of the University in accordance with Section 11 of the Jabalpur University Act, 1956.

( 2 ) THE material facts are that the term of the respondent No. 3, Pt. Kunjilal Dubey, as the Vice-Chancellor was due to expire on 11th June 1961, and the appointment of a new Vice-Chancellor had to be made. According to Section 11 the Vice-Chancellor is appointed by the Chancellor from a panel of not less than three names recommended by a committee constituted in accordance with Sub-section (2 ). This Committee is constituted by the Chancellor and consists of three persons. One of them is





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top