SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 165

P.K.TARE
LALCHAND DHANALAL – Appellant
Versus
DHARAMCHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.Bharucha, H.K.MAHESHWARI, S.R.JOSHI

P. K. TARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the plaintiff against the decree, dated 31-8-1960, passed by shri D. P. Vohra, Additional District Judge, Dewas, in Civil Appeal No. 121 of 1959, reversing the decree, dated 29-9-1959, passed by Shri A. K. Sen, Civil Judge, class I, Dewas in Civil Suit No. 418 of 1954.

( 2 ) THERE was a shop known as 'hemraj Dharmalal', which was owned by dhannalal. He died some time in June 1940 leaving behind his widow, Mst. Sunderbai and his predeceased son, Sohanlal's widow, Mst. Rambhabai. Mst. Sunderbai died some time in November or December, 1945. Before her death, she had adopted the present appellant, Lalchand as a son to her deceased husband by a deed, dated 3-7-1945. Subsequently, the third respondent, Mst. Rambhabai also adopted another son, Mahendrakumar (respondent 2 ). However, we are not concerned with the adoption made by Mst. Rambhabai, widow of Sohanlal. The appellant's adoption was the subject matter of a former decision of the Madhya bharat High Court consisting of M. V. Bhide C. J. and Rege J. to First Appeal No. 27 of 1944, dated 17-9-1946. wherein the learned Judges upheld the factum and the validity of the adoption of Lalchand.

( 3 ) T

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top