SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(MP) 86

P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
NAROTTAMDAS HARJIWANDAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.H.SAFI, A.P.SEN, B.V.SHUKLA, G.M.CHAPHEKAR, K.A.Chitale, S.A.AWASTHY

DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS order will also govern Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 281, 300 and 305, all of 1962.

( 2 ) THE petitioners in these four cases under Article 226 of the Constitution challenge the vires-of the Madhya Pradesh Minimum Wages Fixation Act, 1962, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and seek a declaration that the Act is invalid, ultra vires and unenforceable and pray that the opponents be restrained by a suitable direction from putting the Act into operation.

( 3 ) TWO of the petitioners are manufacturers of Bidis. The other petitioners carry on the business of running transport services. By notifications Nos. 306 to 309 XVI58, dated the 30th December 1958, issued under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, (hereinafter referred to as the Central Act), the Government fixed rates of minimum wages for certain employments including Bidi-mak-ing manufactory and public motor transport. The rates of minimum wages set out in the notifications were brought into force from 1st January, 1959. These notifications were struck down by this Court as invalid and inoperative in anand Transport Co. , (Private) Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh, M. P. No. 150 of 1959, D/- 28-4-1960 (UP ). Cor






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top