SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(MP) 67

K.L.PANDEY, SHIV DAYAL
GOPAL PRASAD DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.J.BHAVE, S.C.DATTA, Y.S.DHARMADHIKARI

PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is directed against-

(i) the High Court's administrative order No. 2209/111-18-126/63 dated 12 March 1964 whereby an appeal preferred by one T. P. Shrivastava (respondent 3) was allowed and he was restored to the post of stenographer to the District and Sessions Judge, Jabalpur, with effect from the date of his taking over charge o ( the post; and (ii) an order dated 13 March 1964 by which, in implementing the aforesaid order of the High Court, the District and Sessions Judge, jabalpur (respondent 2), cancelled the confirmation of the petitioner on the post of stenographer to the District and Sessions Judge, Jabalpur. reverted him to a lower post of clerk-stenographer and stopped his special allowance of Rs. 25/ -.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this petition arc simple and may be shortly stated. The petitioner and the respondent 3 were working as clerk-stenographers in the office of the District and Sessions Judge, Jabalpur, from 23 December 1946 and 5 June 1947 respectively and they were subsequently confirmed on those posts. In the year 1957, the services of one R. G. Bhatt, the permanent stenographer t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top