SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(MP) 67

R.J.BHAVE, P.V.DIXIT
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
PUNJABHAI SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.ADHIKARI, P.S.KHIRVADKAR, R.K.Tankha

P. V. DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) IN this reference by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income tax, the question which has been placed for our decision is-

"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee could be said to have concealed the particulars of his income for the assessment year 1959-60 so as to be penalised Under Section 271 (1) (c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?"

( 2 ) THE material facts are that for the assessment year 1959-60 the total income of the assessee. Punjabhai Shah, was fixed at Rs. 10,953/ -. During the course of assessment for the next year, namely, 1960-61, it was noticed that the assessee had purchased a motor vehicle and made payments for the purchase of the vehicle as under-

1.

26-08-1958

Rs . 1,00. 00

2.

08-09-1958

Rs . 9,000. 00


3.

23-09-1958

Rs . 3,800. 00


4.

23-09-1958

Rs . 3,450. 00 body building


5.

30-09-1958

Rs . 9,000. 00


6.

07-10-1958

Rs . 8,000. 00



Rs . 31,250. 00



The assessment for the year 1959-60, was therefore, reopened under Section 147 of the Act. The assessee's explanation with regard to these payments was that on 26th August, 1958 h













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top