SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(MP) 82

R.J.BHAVE, BISHAMBHAR DAYAL, S.P.BHARGAVA
BABULAL BHIKAJI MANDLOI – Appellant
Versus
DATTATRAYA NARAYAN – Respondent


BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) AN election for Mandleshwar Municipality was held at Mandleshwar where the court of the District Judge is situate for the Civil District of West Nimar, mandleshwar is also within the Revenue District. Section 20 of the Madhya Pradesh municipalities Act, 1961, provides for filing an election petition. The section reads as under:

"20. Election petitions.-- (1) No election or selection under this Act shall be called into question except by a petition presented in accordance with the provisions of this section. (2) Such petition may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in Section 22-- (a ). . . . . (b) (i ). . . . . (ii ). . . . . to the District Judge, where such election or selection is held within the revenue District in which the Court of the District judge is situate, and in any other case, to the Additional District Judge having the permanent seat of his Court within the revenue District in which such election or selection is held and if there be more than one such Additional District judge within the said revenue District, to such one of them as the district Judge may specify for the purpose (hereinafter such District judge or Additional Distric


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top