SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(MP) 112

SHIV DAYAL, S.M.N.RAINA
PANCHAM RAMCHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE COLLECTOR, DIST. BHIND AND ORS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.MISHRA, R.K.SHARMA, R.S.Bajpai

SHIV DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the election of a Panch for the Gram Panchayat, Barathara.

( 2 ) IT is stated in the petition that the last general election of the Panchayat was held on May 23, 1970. Nathuram (respondent No. 4) and Laxminarayan (respondent No. 5) were candidates from ward No. 2. The said Nathuram was declared elected.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is a voter. His contentions are: (1) The voters list was not prepared as required by the rules, framed under Section 5, of the Election and Cooption rules, 1963. (2) The voters list became final when it was published in the gazette dated March 30, 1970, but 8 names were added in the voters list "after 15-70. " In the petition, the significance of that date is not stated but before us it is said that on that date nomination papers were filed and scrutinised. Addition of names after the date of nomination was not permissible under the rules. (3)Nathuram was disqualified inasmuch as he was a defaulter in respect of arrears of taxes of the Panchayat after notice of demand. (4) The Presiding Officer, who presided, was not appointed specifically under Rule 63 of the Panchayat Ele














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top