P.K.TARE, G.L.OZA, H.R.KRISHNAN
SUBHASH CHANDRA SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this Writ Petition, which is described as a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, two questions are mainly involved. So far as Article 227 of the Constitution of India is concerned, it will be out of the picture. Subclause (4) of Article 227 of the Constitution specifically excludes courts martial from the operation of the Article. It is as follows :--"article 227 (4 ).-- Nothing in this article shall be deemed to confer on a high Court powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces. " therefore, court-martial can in no sense be considered to be a Tribunal subordinate to the High Court. But the said bar does not find place in Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, although courts-martial may not be considered to be Tribunals subordinate to the High Court or for the purposes of article 136 of the Constitution of India subordinate to the Supreme Court, they will be amenable to the prerogative jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India
Soubhagya Chandra v. Union of India
Som Datt Datta v. Union of India
Assistant Collector of Customs v. Soorajmull Nagarmull
State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd.
Baburam v. Zila Parishad, Muzaffarnagar
B.B.and D. Mfg. Co. v. L.K.Bose
Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. The State of Bihar
Ebrahim Aboobakar v. Custodian General of Evacuee Property
State of U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh
Carl Still G.m.b.H. v. State of Bihar
Himmatlal Harilal Mehta v.State of M.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.