SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(MP) 106

U.N.BHACHAWAT
BADRI PRASAD SONI – Appellant
Versus
S. KRIPAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.C.Bhatia, T.C.Naik

U. N. BHACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) THE present revision has been filed by the plaintiff and has arisen in the following manner.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF has filed the suit for eviction of the defendant-non-applicant herein from the suit shop alleging that he bona fide needs the suit shop for settling his son-in-law who along with his daughter is living with him and is dependent on him for maintenance. The relevant averment in the plaint are as under:

"2. Plaintiff has one issue -- Smt. Asha Bai. She has been married with Shri Deenak Kumar. They live with the plaintiff as members of his family. They depend on him for their maintenance. 3. Plaintiff is old and has now developed cancer. He may close his eves any day. He therefore wants to settle his son-in-law by opening a shop of Jewellery--will make a show room and self Silver wares and silver ornaments etc. Plaintiff will open a shop for him with a capital of Rs. 20,000/- which plaintiff has got. Plaintiff's son-in-law for whom he requires the premises in suit is not in possession of premises of his own in the town of Jabalpur for the purpose aforesaid. "

( 3 ) THE suit has been resisted by the defendant controverting the main plaint allegations. Afte























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top