SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(MP) 70

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
C. P. Sen and K. N. Shukla, JJ.
VITTHALRAO MAHALE - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - Respondents
Misc. Petn. 119 Of 1982
Decided On : 01/31/1984

Advocates Appeared:
M.V.TAMSKAR, V.S.DABIR

The principle of promissory estoppel is not available against the Government in exercise of legislative, sovereign or executive power.

Headnote:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - ARTICLE 226 - WRIT OF MANDAMUS - ESTABLISHMENT OF PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE - SHIFTING OF CENTRE FROM ONE VILLAGE TO ANOTHER - POLITICAL MOTIVATION - PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL AGAINST STATE GOVERNMENT.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner, claiming to be the Secretary of the Laghu Swasthya Kendra Samiti (Mini Primary Health Centre), Rangarithoka, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of mandamus directing the State of M.P. not to shift the mini primary health centre from Rangarithoka and to make it a permanent centre. The petitioner alleged that the shifting of the centre was politically motivated and that the Minister of State for Health had assured the villagers that a permanent primary health centre would be located in Rangarithoka if they donated land for the purpose.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the decision to shift the primary health centre from Rangarithoka to Rangarisafar was taken by the Janata Government and endorsed by the Congress Government. The court also found that the decision was taken on merits and on overall consideration of the relevant circumstances. The court further found that the villagers of Rangarithoka had no right to insist that the primary health centre should be located in their village and that the Government had acted in the best interests of all the adjoining villages by locating the centre at Rangarisafar.

Issues: 1. Whether the shifting of the primary health centre from Rangarithoka to Rangarisafar was politically motivated. 2. Whether the State Government was bound by the assurance allegedly given by the Minister of State for Health to the villagers of Rangarithoka.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that there was no evidence to support the allegation that the shifting of the primary health centre was politically motivated. The court noted that the decision had been taken by the Janata Government and endorsed by the Congress Government, and that the decision was based on merits and on overall consideration of the relevant circumstances. 2. The court held that the State Government was not bound by the assurance allegedly given by the Minister of State for Health to the villagers of Rangarithoka. The court noted that the principle of promissory estoppel was not available against the Government in exercise of legislative, sovereign or executive power.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed.

C. P. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is petition under Article 226 of 'the Constitution by petitioner Vitthal Rao Mahale claiming himself to he the Secretary of the Laghu Swasthya Kendra Samiti (Mini Primary Health Centre), Rangarithoka, Tahsil, Sausar, for a writ of mandamus directing the State of M. P. not to shift the mini primary health centre from that place and also to make it a permanent centre.

( 2 ) THE petition has been filed in a representative capacity on behalf of the residents of Rangarithoka saying that it is a village having population of 2100 with scanty medical facilities although there is a Janpad Ayurvedic Dispensary in the village but the nearest Civil Dispensary is at Lodhikeda, 5 Kms. away, separated by two rivers. Rangarisafar is the adjacent village about 1 Km. away. Due to constant efforts of the villagers, mini primary health centre was established in 1979 by the State which is being run in the said Ayurvedic Dispensary in a skeleton form catering the need of Rangarithoka and the adjacent villages. The present Minister of State for Health of the State of M, P. i. e. respondent No. 3 Shri Reonath Choure is elected to the M, P. Vidhan Sabha from Sausar constituency. He was also a sitting M. L. A. of this constituency before the present election. However, due to political rivalry, he carries ill-feelings against the villagers of Rangarithoka and there has been persistent attempts at his instance to deprive the village of the facilities of a health centre. On the eve of last election to the Vidhan Sabha, a number of villagers approached Shri Choure expressing their fear and apprehension that the health centre will be shifted from their village. On 6-12-1979 Shri Choure wrote to them that final decision regarding health centre will be taken in their presence. After the Vidhan Sabha election in early 1980, Shri Choure became Minister of State for Health, a deputation of villagers met him on 8-11-1980 and he asked them to raise money and donate land within 8 days in between two villages of Rangarithoka and Ranga-risafar so that primary health centre will be established. Acting on his assurance, the villagers collected a sum of Rupees 5,000/- and purchased 0. 50 acre out of khasra No. 305 by registered sale deed dated 18-11-1980 in village Rangarithoka on the border towards Rangarisafar on the main road. Immediately an application was sent to Shri Choure with the sale deed annexed for fulfilling his promise. In spite of this, there is a definite attempt on the part of Shri Choure to dislodge the health centre from Rangarithoka and establish a health centre at Rangarisafar.

( 3 ) THE contentions of the petitioner are: (i) under the Constitution the State is obliged to make provisions for welfare of the citizens including facilities for health, the political rivalries cannot be utilised to deprive the health facilities they have been enjoying so far and the proposed action is against the guarantee conferred on the citizens by the Constitution of India, (ii) Shri Choure having represented to the villagers to donate land for establishment of a primary health centre and the villagers having acted on that representation incurred financial liability, purchased land and donated the same to the State Government, there is no justification whatsoever to close the health centre at Rangarithoka and instead establish one at Rangarisafar. The villagers have no objection if another primary health centre is established at Rangarisafar. (iii) the action of the respondents to shift primary health centre from Rangarithoka to Ran-gerisafar is mala fide and due to ill-will and political rivalry which Shri Choure carries against the villagers of Rangarithoka, ( 4 ) IN their return, the respondents submitted that Rangarithoka and Rangarisafar are not two separate villagers but are two parts or Tola of village Rangari. In the revenue record also, Rangari is recorded as the village. With a view to implement "minimum Needs Programme" of the Gover





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top