P.S.KAILASAM, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Jit Ram Shiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content or specify the key points you'd like me to analyze.
JUDGMENT
P. S. KAILASAM, J.:— These two appeals are by Certificate granted by the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in C. W. No. 444/1968 and C. W. No. 2975 of 1967 respectively. The petitions were disposed of by a Full Bench of the High Court on 15-12-1969.
2. The Appellants who were the petitioners before the High Court prayed for a writ of certiorari or mandamus or any other appropriate writ for quashing the resolution No. 6 dated 21st July, 1965 of the Municipality and letter of the Government of Haryana to the President of the Municipal Committee, Bahadurgarh dated 30-10-1967. The facts of the case briefly are as follows :-
The Municipal Committee of Bahadurgarh, Respondent No. 2, established Mandi Fateh in Bahadurgarh Town, with a view to improve trade in the area. The Municipal Committee decided that the purchasers of the plots for sale in the Mandi would not be required to pay octroi duty on goods imported within the said Mandi. In pursuance of this decision, resolution No. 8 dated 20-11-1916 was passed by the Municipality, Handbills were issued for the sale of the plots on the basis of the resolution and it was proclaimed that Fateh Mandi would remain exempt from p
relied on : Excise Commr., U. P., Allahabad v. Ram Kumar
M. Ramanatha Pillai v. Stale of Kerala
State of Kerala v. Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd.
Karamshi Jtthabhai Somayya v. State of Bombay
Collector of Bombay v. Munpl. Corpn., Bombay
State of W. B. v. B. K. Mondal and Sons
New Marine Coal Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Assistant Custodian of Evacuee Property v. Brij Kishore Agarwala
Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Co-op. Society Ltd. v. Sipahi Singh
Turner Morrison Co. Ltd. v. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd.
Century Spinning and Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Ulhasnagar Munpl. council
C. Sankaranarayanan v. State of Kerala
Narinder Chand Hem Raj v. Lt. governor, Administrator, U. T., H P.
State of T. N. v. S. K. Krishnamurthi
Andhra Industrial Works v. Chief Controller of Imports
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
explained and distinguished : Union of India v. Indo-Afghan Agencies Ltd.
explained and commented : Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co.(P)Ltd. v. State of U. P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.