SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 299

P.D.MULYE, R.K.VERMA
SADHANA AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.M.CHAPHEKAR, S.C.BAODIA, S.M.JAIN, V.S.KOKJE

R. K. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner who have made a grievance against the arbitrary dealings of the Indore Development Authority vis a vis the petitioners and others who are the prospective purchasers of flat in Navlakha Complex constructed by the Indore Development Authority in its Scheme No. 31.

( 2 ) THE petitioners have stated in the opening paragraph of their petition that they have filed this petition not only in their personal capacity as aggrieved parties but also in the capacity of representatives of over 100 other persons aggrieved by the very same conduct/decision/orders of Indore Development Authority, who attended and participated in meetings of such persons as per list Appendix 'a' appended to the petition and have desired to file and support the petition and also in the capacity of responsible citizens agitating against wrongs by a public body and authority, in the public interest. The petitioners have prayed that this petition be treated as a public interest petition for protection of interests of the public and of a large class of persons, besides being a personal petition. The petitioners ave























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top