SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 65

M.D.BHATT
RADHAMANI – Appellant
Versus
SONU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL AWASTHY, K.PATHAK

M. D. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is the wife's revision against the dismissal of her claim under S. 125 of the Criminal P. C. 1973, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bastar, for her own maintenance and for the maintenance of her two minor children.

( 2 ) THE factum of lawful marriage between the parties according to the Hindu Rites and customs about 15 years back from now, is admitted; and so also, the fact that the two minor children Salindhar (aged now 9 years) and Gohindu (aged now 7 years), who were born out of their lawful wedlock, are living at present, with the applicant Mst. Radhamani at the latter's father's place (Para 1 of the petition ). The respondent husband is employed in Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board as a helper on the monthly salary of Rs. 600/ -.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the wife's petition, the respondent-husband, about two years before the presentation of the petition, had turned out his wife and his two minor children from his parental house and had left them to their own lot, and since then the applicant-wife along with the children is living at her parental house. The respondent-husband was alleged to have brought one woman Mst. Bodebai and to have kept her with him as














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top