SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 32

K.K.VERMA
JAGMANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
HEMSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.Chaturvedi, R.C.Lahoti

K. K. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall govern the question of maintainability of this Civil Revision (No. 1041 of 1984) as well as Civil Revision Nos. 1043/84, 837/84, 28/84, 924/84, 895/84, 925/84, 1033/84, 1037/84, 965/84, 1036/84 and 10/85, filed after 14-8-1984 arising out of orders passed by the Judges of Courts of District Judge in Miscellaneous Civil Appeals preferred from appealable orders passed by the Courts of Civil Judge, Class I and Class II in suits of valuation of less than Rs. 20,000/ -. It shall also govern C. R. No. 990/84 in which an appellate decree in which no second appeal lies in view of Sections 96 (4) and 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure is sought to be revised.

( 2 ) THE counsel have been heard on admission of these civil revision petitions in which the point mooted was whether these revision petitions (filed in the High Court after 14-8-1984) are maintainable in the wake of the amendment brought about in Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the Code of Civil Procedure (M. P. Amendment) Act 84 (No. 29 of 84), which came into force on 14-8-84. The relevant portion of amended provision runs as follows : - the High Court in cases arising out












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top