SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 262

K.M.AGARWAL, RAM PAL SINGH
GANGARAM BENDIL – Appellant
Versus
RASHMI PARIHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Dubey, R.K.Shinde

K. M. AGARWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal by the returned candidate is directed against an order passed on 18-8-1986 by the learned single Judge of this Court in a pending Election Petition No. 23 of 1985.

( 2 ) THE respondent No. 1 challenged the election of the appellant as a member of the Legislative Assembly of the State of Madhya Pradesh from No. 16, Lashkar East constituency in the election held in 1985 on the ground of corrupt practice. After service of notice of the election petition, the appellant filed his return and, inter alia, raised an objection about the maintainability of the petition on the ground that "the affidavit is an integeral part of the petition and a true copy thereof duly attested under the signatures of the petitioner has to be served on the respondents. But the petitioner has not served a true copy-of the affidavit on the Answering Respondent. As such the petition is liable to be dismissed summarily under S. 81 read with S. 86 of the Act. " On the basis of this objection, following issue was framed, tried and decided as a preliminary issue against the appellant by the impugned order of the learned single Judge :-" (I ). Whether the affidavit co












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top