K.M.AGARWAL, RAM PAL SINGH
GANGARAM BENDIL – Appellant
Versus
RASHMI PARIHAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal by the returned candidate is directed against an order passed on 18-8-1986 by the learned single Judge of this Court in a pending Election Petition No. 23 of 1985.
( 2 ) THE respondent No. 1 challenged the election of the appellant as a member of the Legislative Assembly of the State of Madhya Pradesh from No. 16, Lashkar East constituency in the election held in 1985 on the ground of corrupt practice. After service of notice of the election petition, the appellant filed his return and, inter alia, raised an objection about the maintainability of the petition on the ground that "the affidavit is an integeral part of the petition and a true copy thereof duly attested under the signatures of the petitioner has to be served on the respondents. But the petitioner has not served a true copy-of the affidavit on the Answering Respondent. As such the petition is liable to be dismissed summarily under S. 81 read with S. 86 of the Act. " On the basis of this objection, following issue was framed, tried and decided as a preliminary issue against the appellant by the impugned order of the learned single Judge :-" (I ). Whether the affidavit co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.