SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 252

V.D.GYANI
RAVINDRA – Appellant
Versus
PRATIBHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAR SINGH, P.P.Joshi

V. D. GYANI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order dated 17-7-1986, passed by the District Judge, Indore in M. J. C. No. 73/85, and an ex parte decree for divorce was passed in Hindu Marriage Act case No. 139/85. The Appellant moved an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside ex parte decree. The Trial Court, placing reliance on decision, as reported in AIR 1985 Gau 44, Anjankumar v. Smt. Minakshi Sarma, dismissed the application, holding that the same was not maintainable.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that Section 21 of the Hindu Marriage Act, (hereinafter called as 'the Act') specifically laid down the applicability of Code of Civil Procedure to such proceedings, as far as possible. It was contended that there is no reason why the procedure for setting aside ex parte decree as laid down under Order 9, Rule 13, CPC, should not be followed in cases under the Act. Counsel for the respondent, on the hand, submitted that the application under Order 9, Rule 13, CPC was made solely with the object of gaining time to prefer an appeal before this Court. It was also pointed out that the application under Order 9, Rule 13, C








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top