( 1 ) SATTE-PE-SATTA or double wager of the auction-purchaser, it is seriously complained by appellants, has perverted judicial process. He has withdrawn the purchase-money. Decree-holder has been paid off. Why auction-purchasers' unjust enrichment must take place under a defunct judicial writ ?

( 2 ) CONTENTIONS aforesaid are pivotal and common to the decision to be rendered in the two appeals and indeed for the self-same reason the appeals are heard analogously though the older one, S. A. No. 107 of 1975, raises other important questions of law also and is, therefore, being treated first. It arises out of a suit, instituted on 3-5-65, praying, inter alia, for a declaration that the house "shobha Bhawan" attached in Execution Case No. 67 of 1960 of the court of Civil Judge, Morena, was not liable to be sold in public auction and that attachment and auction sale of that house were illegal, inoperative in law and void.

( 3 ) DURING last twenty-seven years of travail the journey which parties have made to his court was not made on boulevard only. Lanes and alleys which parties crossed are to be revisited also for appreciating and disposing of rival contentions. The appe