SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 211

N.D.OJHA, C.P.SEN, K.K.ADHIKARI
RAJEEV KHANDELWAL – Appellant
Versus
ARUN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.M.Dharmadhikari, M.M.Sapre

N. D. OJHA, CJ.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in his capacity as landlord of an accommodation of which the respondent was the tenant obtained a decree for eviction of the respondent and for arrears of rent under the provisions of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961. When the decree was put in execution, the respondent filed an objection purporting to be under Section 47, Code of Civil Procedure, asserting that he had made payment of the decretal amount out of Court to the decree-holder, that a compromise had been arrived at between the parties that the judgement-debtor shall deliver vacant possession of the accommodation to the decree-holder and that it will be again given to the judgement-debtor on an enhanced rent of Rs. 500/- per month, the earlier rent being Rs. 275/- per month. His case further was that he complied with the terms of the fresh agreement and that since he was now in possession over the accommodation in pursuance of fresh agreement of tenancy, the decree under execution had become inexecutable. The case of the petitioner in reply to the said objection was that he never entered into any agreement of fresh tenancy as alleged by the respondent, that no payment whatsoev
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top