SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 277

P.C.PATHAK
MISS KRISHNA SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KRISHNA SAHU, N.C.JAIN, N.K.SHUKLA

P. C. PATHAK, J.

( 1 ) THE brief facts of this case are that non-applicant Sagarlal Behera filed a complaint under section 98, Cr. P. C. that according banani custom prevalent in his Sahu community, he married Ku. Krishna Bijli Sahu, aged about 22 years, the daughter of Laxmidhar Sahu on 20/5/1985 at Raipur and thereafter both lived together at Raipur. She was allowed to return to her village Laida In district Sambalpur (Orissa) to prosecute her studies and even thereafter she had been visiting him at Raipur. Krishna allegedly became pregnant through him but aborted on 16/2/1986. Dr. (Mrs.) K. Tiwari treated her at Raipur. The applicant further stated that the was with him in September and October, 1986. During this period, the applicant, in token of fidelity and marital bliss, purchased properties and opened bank accounts in her name. Thereafter Krishna went to her father at village Laida. Her father Laxmidhar Sahu and uncle Madan Mohan Sahu did not permit her to return back to him. The applicant was also not allowed to meet her. He received information that Krishnas marriage has been settled with one Shesh Deo Kaiwart and the marriage was to be performed on 18/1/1987. Therefore t

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top