S.K.DUBEY
VIMALCHAND – Appellant
Versus
GYANMALA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a revision under S. 115 of the Civil P. C. against the order dated 6-11988, passed by the District Judge, Dewas in Misc. Civil Case No. 14/84, allowing the application under O. 33, R. 1, C. P. C. of the non-applicant, allowing the non-applicant to sue as an indigent person and ordered the plaint filed by her to be treated as a plaint in the suit and the suit has to proceed in all other respects as a suit instituted in the ordinary manner, except for payment of court fees.
( 2 ) THE main contention of Shri K. B. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners (non-applicants before the Trial Court) was that the report of the Collector in respect of pauperism was against the non-applicant, but the learned District Judge, without considering the said report and holding that no report is received, held on enquiry made by it, the non-applicant/plaintiff as an indigrent person. The Court-fees payable on the suit for partition is of Rs. 11,000/- on the share of the plaintiff/non-applicant, which the plaintiff has to receive if ultimately the decree is passed against the defendants. The non-applicant/plaintiff was having ornaments of about 40,000/- to Rs. 50,000/- a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.