SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 32

B.C.VARMA, S.AWASTHY
STATE OF M. P. – Appellant
Versus
JASWANTPURI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.V.TAMSKAR, Rajendra Tiwari, V.S.Shroti

B. C. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an applcation for review of our order dated 11-11-1987 passed in Miscellaneous Petition No. 928 of 1987.

( 2 ) THE non-applicants responded to an advertisement issued by the State Junior Service Selection Board, Bhopal and faced interview for appointment to the posts of Lower Division Teachers. The Selection Board found them suitable for those posts. Their names were included in the list of successful candidates for Hoshangabad district. About 500 persons were included in Select List. They contended that the list was arranged in order of merit. Out of that list of 500 successful candidates only 232 persons were appointed. The petitioners (non- applicants in this application) in Miscellaneous Petition No. 928 of 1987 contended that although certain posts remained vacant, 95 persons not included in the aforesaid list of 500 persons were appointed as Teachers. They claimed that those 95 posts should have been filled in from among the persons included in that Select List. If that were done, they could well have been appointed. For the reasons stated in the order dated 11/11/1987 this contention did not find favour with the Court and was rejected. The state






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top