A.G.QURESHI, S.K.DUBEY
BAIJNATH – Appellant
Versus
ZILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK, MARYADIT, DHAR – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order of his compulsory retirement (Annexuref) dated 23-8-1988 passed under Rule 72 of the Madbya pradesh Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Karamchari Sewa (Niyojan, Nibandhan tatha Karyasthiti) Niyam, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as "the Service rules" ).
( 2 ) IT is not disputed that the Service Rules are statutory Service Rules framed by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Madhya Pradesh, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 55 (1) of the M. P. Co-operative societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). The petitioner's case, in brief, is that he was appointed as a driver on 20th November, 1964. By an order dated 17-4-1985 (Annexure B), the petitioner was demoted from the post of Driver to the post of Peon. The petitioner raised a dispute about his demotion, under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the conciliation proceedings were pending. During the pendency of the conciliation proceedings, the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, passed an order under Section 49-A (2) of the Act anulling the order of demotion. Hence,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.