R.C.LAHOTI
DWARIKA – Appellant
Versus
BISO – Respondent
( 1 ) APPEAL has been preferred by the owners of tractor trolley involved in a motor accident against whom the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has made an interim award u/s. 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for payment of Rs. 15,000/- to the claimants/respondents No. 1 to 7 (the legal representatives of the deceased in the incident), but exonerating the insurance company, the respondent No. 8 from payment on the ground that the deceased was travelling in the tractor at the time of the accident and being not a third party, the insurance company was not liable to compensate for the loss of the life.
( 2 ) IT is not disputed that the deceased was travelling in the tractor at the time of the accident and that the tractor was insured with the insurance company, the respondent No. 8. The learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent No. 8 have cited a host of case law on the point as to whether an insurance company would be liable to pay compensation for loss occasioned by the death of a traveller in a goods vehicle. The learned counsel for the appellant relies on 1988 (3) SCC 1, Pushpabai Parshottam Udeshi v. Ranjit Ginning
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sitla Prasad
N.K.V. Bros. (P) Ltd. v. M.Karumai Ammal
REFERRED TO : Ravi Kumar v. Ram Prakash
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sarda Devi
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jamna Bai
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Shakuntala Bai
Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Alex Fernandes
Pushpabai Parshottam Udeshi v. Ranjit Ginning and Pressing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.