SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 129

S.P.KHARE
N. P. JHARIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alka Pandya, RAJENDRA SINGHVI, S.P.SHRIVASTAVA

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT N. P. Jharia has been convicted under Section 5 (1) (e) read with Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and to a fine of Rs. 75,000/ -.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the appellant was appointed as Sales Tax Officer on 16-9-1975 and he was occupying that post during the check period of 16-9-1975 to 31-12-1983. He was married to Pushpa Jharia (DW1) in the year 1969 and he has three children.

( 3 ) THE prosecution case is that during the period 16-9-1975 to 31-12-1983 the appellant was in possession of pecuniary resources and property worth Rs. 10,19,210/- as disproportionate to his known sources of income. A detailed discussion will be made later in this judgment. After investigation the Special Police Establishment had submitted "final Report" on 1-3-1990 informing the Court that no offence is made out against the appellant. That final report was accepted by the Special Judge on 17-4-1990. But on 1-7-1992 the S. P. E. submitted an application before the Special Judge for permisison for further investigation. The Special Judge permitted





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top