SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 309

BAHARUL ISLAM, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, A.P.SEN
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Wasudeo Ramghandra Kaidalwar – Respondent


Advocates:
K.R.CHAUDHARY, K.RAMANTAR, M.C.BHANDARE, P.GOVINDAN NAYAR, R.N.Poddar

Judgment

SEN, J.:- The State Government of Maharashtra has preferred this appeal, by special leave, against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, reversing the judgment and sentence of the Special Judge, Chandrapur and acquitting the respondent of an offence under S. 5 (2) read with S. 5 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act).

2. The respondent, Wasudeo Ramchandra Kaidalwar, was a Range Forest Officer, drawing a salary of Rs. 515/- per month. On September 21, 1969, PW 71, Patwardhan, Inspector, Anti-Corruption Bureau under authorisation from the Director, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Bombay, carried out search and seizure at the residential house of the respondent. The Inspector made a recovery of Rs. 26,870/- in cash from an almirah, savings bank accounts in the names of the respondent, his wife and children totalling to Rupees 12,588.35, national savings certificates worth Rs. 510/-, postal savings certificates worth Rs. 184.25 in the name of his daughter, Nandini, savings bank deposits with the State Bank of India and the postal savings certificates in the name of his brother-in-law, Narayan, amounting to Rs. 2,279.05, gold and silver ornaments,























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top