SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 413

S.P.SRIVASTAVA, N.G.KARAMBELKAR
PUSHPA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
KAMAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.MALHOTRA, R.P.Gupta

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by an award of Motor Accidents Claims tribunal under the proceedings under section 110-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, whereunder as against the claim of compensation to the extent of Rs. 6,88,000 by the present claimants-appellants, they had been awarded an amount of Rs. 2,16,000 and that too against the owner and driver of the offending motor vehicle which was a tractor exonerating the insurer company, they have now come up in appeal praying for modification of the award and grant of the amount of compensation as prayed for against not only the owner and driver but also against the insurer.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the record.

( 3 ) THE facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass: Dwarika Prasad the husband of the appellant No. 1 and the father of the other appellants died in an accident involving the offending motor vehicle, tractor bearing registration No. CPH 6414 on 30. 7. 1985.

( 4 ) THE present appellants submitted an application under section 110-A of the motor Vehicles Act, 1939, on 26. 8. 1985 raising a claim for

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top