SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 682

ARUN MISHRA
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, PANNA – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AND ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, SAGAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.CHAURASIA, S.K.MUKHERJEE

ARUN MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) THE question involved in the instant writ petition is whether provisions of Payment of gratuity Act, 1972 are applicable to Municipal council, Panna, the petitioner, and the order of Controlling Authority directing Municipal council to pay the gratuity amounting to Rs. 14507. 00 along with interest at the rate of 10% simple interest with effect from September 1, 1996 is proper.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was employed as timekeeper. He was appointed on January 1, 1975 and was removed from the service on august 31,1996. He served for a period of 21 years and 8 months. His last pay was Rs. 1,1437- p. m. Petitioner claimed entitlement for gratuity amounting to Rs. 15,840. 00.

( 3 ) CONTROLLING Authority issued notice to the Municipal Council, Panna. The petitioner herein, in reply contended that respondent no. 2 was appointed as muster roll employee. Initially his services were terminated on March 12, 1985. Thereafter he was employed on temporary basis for 89 days. Since respondent no. 2 completed the age of 65 years, he was removed from the service. Additionally it was contended that since respondent no. 2 was not in regular employment, hence provisions of payment of Gr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top