SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 418

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
VISHNU SHARAN – Appellant
Versus
AJUDDHIBAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Jain, J.P.SHARMA, K.M.Mishra, Panel Lawyer

A. K. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants have preferred this appeal against judgment and decree passed by appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of learned trial court decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs for declaration, injunction and possession.

( 2 ) ORIGINAL plaintiff is Sangram Singh whose legal representatives are respondent nos. 1 to 7. Sangram Singh filed a suit on the basis of title that he is the Bhumiswami of Survey No. 56 area 40 Bighas of Village muhasa, Tah. Pichhore. According to him, out of 40 Bighas an area 5. 16 acres is the disputed land. According to the plaintiff on 3-8-1968, the defendants by removing mound (merh) between survey Nos. 56 and 57 took possession of the disputed land, hence, present suit has been filed.

( 3 ) THE defendants by filing their written statement denied the plaint averments. It has been specifically denied by them that plaintiff is the Bhumiswami of Survey No. 56, they also pleaded that the plaintiff has not specifically pleaded the source of his title. Other averments pleaded in the plaint have also been denied. Learned trial Court after framing issues and recording evidence of the parties, decreed the suit. The appeal whi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top