SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 34

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
DURG SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAHESH SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.RAIZADA, HANSA AGRAWAL, K.N.AGRAWAL

A. K. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by appellant who is a subsequent purchaser (defendant No. 2) against the judgment and decree dated 27-8-1993 passed by Illrd Additional District Judge, Sagar in civil suit No. 42-A/89 (old No. 3-A/88) decreeing the suit of plaintiff for specific performance of the contract.

( 2 ) IN short the suit of plaintiff is that defendant No. l Devi Singh was the bhumiswami of the suit land which is agricultural land, the said Devi Singh on 11-5-1988 entered into an agreement with the plaintiff for a consideration of Rs. 30. 000/- to sell the land in question to him. A sum of rs. 5000/- was paid as an earnest money and the balance amount was agreed between the parties to be paid on 20-5-1988. In the document the condition was embodied that in the case Devi Singh would avoid to get the sale-deed executed the plaintiff may file a suit for the execution of the sale-deed. The plaintiff, though insisted Devi Singh to get the sale deed executed and when the same will be found, the sale deed shall be executed. It has further been pleaded by the plaintiff that Devi Singh assured that he will obtain a new Bhoo Adhikar Avam Rin pustika, thereaft




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top