S.S.JHA, A.K.GOHIL
STATE OF M. P. – Appellant
Versus
BRIJ – Respondent
( 1 ) BOTH the aforesaid appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 20-8- 1994 passed in Sessions Trial No. 259/92. This judgment shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 188/94 and Criminal Appeal No. 58/95. In Sessions Trial No. 259/92, eight accused persons were tried. Vide judgment dated 20-8-1994, III Additional Sessions Judge, Morena convicted Govind Sb Soneram under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to imprisonment for life against which Govind has filed Criminal Appeal No. 188/94 challenging his conviction and sentence and acquitted the rest of the accused persons namely Brij Sf0. Soneram, Soneram Sf0 Gangaram, Ramnivas S/c Lajjaram, Durga Sb Soneram, Kalicharan Sb Lajjaram, Kaladhar Sb Lajjaram and Maniram Sf0 Lajjaram and against the acquittal of the aforesaid accused persons, State has filed Criminal Appeal No. 58/95 after obtaining leave from this Court. Both these appeals have been heard together and they are being decided by this common judgment.
( 2 ) IN short, the prosecution story is that on 19-8-1992 at about 9 AM in the morning, when complainant Kamlesh Sf0 Vrindavan, his brother Girraj, Bablu, Satish, Ashok and cousin Ramnivas we
Marudanal Augusti v. State of Kerala
State of Rajasthan v. Sheo Singh
Mohd.Aman v. State of Rajasthan
Santa Singh v. State of Punjab
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
State of A.P. v. Punati Ramulu
Lakshmi Singh v. State of Bihar
Jassa Singh v. State of Haryana
Modan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.