SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 484

S.S.JHA, A.K.GOHIL, SUBHASH SAMVATSAR
RAJESH SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
MEENA SHUKLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.Naik

S. S. JHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is sent on reference to this Bench on the following question of law :"whether against the order passed by the Family Court in an application under Section 125 of the Code while exercising jurisdiction under Chapter IX of the Code, revision under sub-section (4)of Section 19 of the Act should be registered as Civil Revision or criminal Revision or Revision Petition (Family)"

( 2 ) THIS Bench is required to consider the correctness of the judgment delivered in the case of Aruna Choudhary v. Sudhakar choudhary. Question involved is whether revision filed before this Court against the order passed under Section 125 of the Code of criminal Procedure by the Family Court shall be registered as Civil Revision or Criminal Revision. In the case of Aruna Choudhary (supra), division Bench of this Court held that civil revision will lie against the said order.

( 3 ) TO examine the controversy, it will be useful to refer to Section 7 of the Family Courts act, 1984 (hereinafter, referred to as the "act" ). Section 7 of the Act is reproduced below:"7. Jurisdiction.- (1) Subject to the other provision of this Act, a Family court shall- (a) have and exercise all the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top