SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 435

K.K.LAHOTI
SHAVARAM ALIAS SEVA – Appellant
Versus
UHAPUBAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.Pavecha, G.M.CHAPHEKAR, SADHANA PATHAK, VIVEK PHADKE

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs appeal who lost in both the Courts below. This appeal was admitted on 23-9-1986, on following substantial questions of law :

"1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned lower appellate Court Judge committed an error of law in not passing a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from dispossessing the appellant from the suit land otherwise than in due course of law ?

2. . Whether the learned lower appellate court Judge committed an error of law in rejecting the Will, Ex. P/2, when no suspicious circumstances attending its execution were pleaded or proved by the respondents ?"

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel appearing for the appellant at the outset submitted that he is pressing his appeal so far as it relates to substantial question of law No. 1 and for substantial question of law No. 2, he is not pressing this appeal as the findings in respect of Will are findings of fact which have been recorded by both Courts below. In view of the aforesaid contentions, both the parties are heard in respect of substantial question of law No. 1

( 3 ) BEFORE considering rival contentions of the parties, it will be appropriate if facts of the p



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top